Andy on Twitter

  • A great piece from Mark Ritson - must read for every marketer ,
  • Atlassian’s two-year cloud journey | TechCrunch ,
  • Clean Up Corrosive Interpersonal Dynamics on Your Team with This System – ,
  • Interesting experiencing a Microsoft vs Google office rig in several years. Suffering productivity decline. Google… ,
  • Great to see James Dilworth added to the business hall of fame. His legacy has made a difference to so many lives t… ,
  • What a great read ,
  • Sydney airport has gone from best in class to total nightmare since I’ve lived here. Time for the Govt to step in.,
  • When marketing a good idea online always good to include the URL ,
  • Connect

News Blinks & Pointers: May 17, AM ’05

  • Looking up words on your Mac…
  • Is that a Condom in your PodCast
  • Now that’s the way to build subscribers… Start charging more… It perhaps the dumbest marketing move of the tear, The New York TImes will, for a fee, provide exclusive access to Op-Ed and news columnists on, easy and in-depth access to The Times’s online archives, early access to select articles on the site, as well as other exciting features. All this will encourage me to do is dump my print subscription all together. The FT is looking nicer by the day… Isn’t EPIC looking real?

One Response

  1. By Alice Marshall on May 17th, 2005 at 6:42 pm

    I think the FT is what they had in mind. A few years ago the FT began to move its opinion section behind the subscription wall, then feature articles. Now most of it is paid content. I think the NYT decided that since the WSJ and FT charged for their material, so could they. We’ll see how well this works, but I have to believe the Guardian Group is smiling right now.

Speak Up — Add Your Thoughts


  • Connect
How did you connect?   [?]