Andy on Twitter

  • And the coverage seems to miss that for some using on their carrier connection it streamed bea… ,
  • The coverage on is so ridiculous. How many people actually got great service vs. those that didn’t? And to… ,
  • A great read for all of you using Google... ,
  • Great interview on AI And The Era Of The Digital Human ,
  • I pick up a new Samsung or Huawei phone and think "this is seriously good" Then I read Apple's announcements today… ,
  • Children of Men is my fave... The best 100 films of the 21st century, according to 177 film critics around the worl… ,
  • Why does my iPhone insist on auto capitalising place names? What on earth is it thinking. ,
  • Why matters more than ever... reduce the complexity, increase confidence, realise better outcomes… ,
  • This might impact the marketing budgets of big business but it really impacts the business of small business owners. ,
  • And the shakedown plays out in other ways, Google doesn’t let you target their trademarks - or even mention “Google… ,
  • Am bewildered how tech companies think "Dark Mode" is a compelling feature. Billions in R&D and what we came up wit… ,
  • Cadbury's brand purpose is just 'woke-washing' - continue to agree with Mark's comments... instead of talking about… ,
  • Couldn't agree more. And how about allowing fake review sites surface higher?Google's paid search ads are a 'shaked… ,
  • Well, thank goodness I have a 13" MacBook... MacBook ban: Qantas, Virgin Australia clamp down on Apple laptops ,
  • Let’s see if this team can redeem themselves. I suspect not. Not due to not having the best talent… ,

Archive for the ‘Link Love’ Category

  • Connect

the Internet makes us superficial

Definitely plan to write more on this… Nick points to A recent edition of Science featured a worrying paper by University of Chicago sociologist James A. Evans titled Electronic Publication and the Narrowing of Science and Scholarship.

Seeking to learn more about how research is conducted online, Evans scoured a database of 34 million articles from science journals. He discovered a paradox: as journals begin publishing online, making it easier for researchers to find and search their contents, research tends to become more superficial.

Evans summarizes his findings in a new post on the Britannica Blog:

[My study] showed that as more journals and articles came online, the actual number of them cited in research decreased, and those that were cited tended to be of more recent vintage. This proved true for virtually all fields of science … Moreover, the easy online availability of sources has channeled researcher attention from the periphery to the core—to the most high-status journals. In short, searching online is more efficient, and hyperlinks quickly put researchers in touch with prevailing opinion, but they may also accelerate consensus and narrow the range of findings and ideas grappled with by scholars.

If part of the Carr thesis [in “Is Google Making Us Stupid?”] is that we are lazier online, and if efficiency is laziness (more results for less energy expended), then in professional science and scholarship, researchers yearn to be lazy…they want to produce more for less.

Ironically, my research suggests that one of the chief values of print library research is its poor indexing. Poor indexing—indexing by titles and authors, primarily within journals—likely had the unintended consequence of actually helping the integration of science and scholarship. By drawing researchers into a wider array of articles, print browsing and perusal may have facilitated broader comparisons and scholarship.

  • Connect

Twitter Updates for 2008-03-05

  • back in Austin #
  • Connect

Twitter Updates for 2008-02-29

  • off earnings and back to work now… #
  • wife says twittering is the lazy mans blogging… #
  • coming soon… writing a 6 page essay now #
  • Connect

Twitter Updates for 2008-02-27

  • Connect

Twitter Updates for 2008-02-26