Andy on Twitter

  • The great thing about Twitter is being a able to have chats with my President. All one way but chats just the same. He's in Sicily!,
  • Peter Farrell is so impressive. Such an amazing Aussie brand and product. Solving real issues. Sleep disorders are a disease.,
  • As much as I complain about airlines huge thanks to for great service on my epic SYD-LAX-AUS-SFO-SJC-LAX-SYD-ADL trip,
  • So proud of the RL team. Amazing achievement. ,
  • Just finishing preso on Mobile experience has by far the worst airline mobile app I've ever reviewed. Shocking. @epicfail,
  • Ultimate in bank branding. Mega Bank. All they need to do is add evil. ,
  • What I Learned From Increasing My Prices - ExtendsLogic ,
  • On marketing workflows... ,
  • So love the story of Ted Kooser... ,
  • ,
  • So much . Going to miss you bro'. ,
  • The ageist conceit that younger workers have more energy | ,
  • Apple Pay is useless. Works less than 50% of time in taxis. Google Pay is 100% great. No bank should be supporting AP. ,
  • Super proud of presenting at YouTube brand camp. So good.,
  • Connect

Links & Blinks

Like many I’m sure, I watched the tributes to 9/11 last night. Behind the scenes a furore is bubbling regarding ABC’s movie. According to the Holmes Report: “American Airlines offers a blistering response to Disney’s fabrication “The Path to 9-11” with a statement calling it “inaccurate and irresponsible” and Editor & Publisher’s coverage suggests that the airline might be considering legal action.” It’s stunning to me that any broadcaster could treat such a sensitive issue with this degree of insensitivity and lack or respect.

Meanwhile, apparently the Government’s drug campaign worked in reverse. According to independent reports, “Instead of reducing the likelihood that kids would smoke marijuana, the ads increased it. Westat found that “greater exposure to the campaign was associated with weaker anti-drug norms and increases in the perceptions that others use marijuana.” More exposure to the ads led to higher rates of first-time drug use among certain groups, like 14- to 16-year-olds and white kids.” To assess the spend purely as an attempt to discourage drug use is to misunderstand the deeper motive in many Government advertising initiatives. Paul says it well:

“They are not designed to discourage kids from smoking pot; they’re designed to make sure kids know that smoking pot is WRONG. So the government sat on the results of the study for 18 months—spending another $220 million on ads it knew were not effective—not because it likes wasting money, but because the money wasn’t wasted. Its supporters, particularly those who believe pot smoking is immoral, want the government to lecture people about the immorality of smoking pot.”

Speak Up — Add Your Thoughts

Connections

  • Connect
How did you connect?   [?]
Indulgences-Coffee