• Connect

Do Press Releases Matter…?

Stephens got an interesting view on this one. We do disagree (I think they do matter) – as he suggests we might – but not by that much. I view the press release as a technical device for notifying media of news from publicly traded companies. That’s about it.

They are of less and less value (think steeply declining curve) as communications tools due to the ubiquity of email, Internet, wire services, blogs, RSS… And, the era of authenticity we’ve entered into questions their tone – and resulting credibility. But the era of transparency we’re in also demands their utility. In my posts below on the Web vs. the Blogosphere you can pretty much replace the Web column with Press Releases.

What Stephen points to though is the need for all communicators to listen to their constituents. How many communicators take the time to ask those constituents how they want to receive news? One of the challenges for any communicator is reaching the full spectrum of buyers, influencers and messengers that make up an audience set. Stephen is a sophisticated influencer and messenger in the upper quadrant of connectivity and engagement. Others will be at in the lower left quadrant – not connected big-time and engaged on an adhoc basis. Technical requirements aside, blogs and press releases represent optimal solutions for different constituent profiles.

Participatory Communications is about just that, participation. I suspect Southwest Airlines effort to raise the visibility of its issues with regard to the Wright Amendment will be much better served by the Internet than by any press release. I love the fact they are inviting their community to engage in their efforts – especially given we have as much of a vested interest in them succeeding as they do. (What a great URL as well!)

Where I also agree with Stephen is that most press releases are crap. Yes, crap. But lets not burn the release just because they aren’t being executed well. Bad writing. Terrible legal intervention. Risk and conflict averse communicators. And no news angle/hook are doing as much to destroy the value of news releases as anything.

And here is where Stephen and I violently agree – language and framing matters – until communicators upgrade their efforts in this area then the relevance of the press release is the least of their worries. The real issue is their own relevance. Their relevance to their constituents. And their relevance to the business.

5 Responses

  1. By Blake on May 6th, 2005 at 6:47 pm

    All very good reads on a an interesting topic…In addition to your thoughts, I guess I view press releases as momentum for launches or to steer away from having to go dark. When I am looking through a company Web site and I dip into their news room, I look in the press release section and think – hey, they are (or are not) a busy company…but it shouldn’t be about quanity – it should be about quality.

  2. By james governor on May 9th, 2005 at 5:54 am

    one i really think should be BANNED. those press releases announcing that magazine has given someone an award. i mean what the shot? why would one magazine or newspaper write an article about how good a different organ thought a vendor or offering was. I HATE those things. Particularly – and any UK PR will tell you, when its a US corporate insisting a release is sent out to a local audience *that probably never heard of the magazine’s prize*. i mean who in Europe reads intelligent enterprise magazine? stop the madness. and they call bloggers self-referential!

  3. By stephen o’grady on May 10th, 2005 at 12:58 pm

    interesting points, andy. you might have pulled me back from the edge. it may be that i’m being to harsh on the medium, judging it by the vast volume of garbage, much as one could condemn TV if all they watched was Fox. i’m still not sold entirely, but ultimately i think you’re right: we probably agree more than we disagree.

Speak Up — Add Your Thoughts


  • Connect
How did you connect?   [?]