Andy on Twitter

  • And so what they should do is apply the learnings from the four days to five days and get even more. Compressing ti… ,
  • Agree with Mark. How ridiculous is this. Ink is cheap in the world of digital - but doesn’t mean you should use it. ,
  • As much as I want Facebook to take as much responsibility as any publisher does for its ads, why aren’t lawmakers p… ,
  • M&A trends in consumer - readiness will matter ⁦@teamansarada⁩ ⁦@ansarada⁩ ,
  • Why do we even care about an irrelevant and illogical ranking system that even Rugby’s big boss denounces as a joke. ,
  • Great that Adidas sorted this but kind of staggering they weren't onto this for decades ,
  • Did Google Duplex just pass the Turing Test? And what happens if the interaction is made even more human with a dig… ,
  • Really basic stuff but worth a read... CMOs and Teamwork: How Can High-Performing Teams Shape Success? ,
  • Opinion | Marc Benioff: We Need a New Capitalism - The New York Times ,
  • When updates an iPhone app - Reminders - that renders it useless with the companion desktop app until Catalina arrives = ,
  • So fed up with commentators reffing the game. They have so much more to offer. All we get is constant… ,
  • How Negative News Distorts Our Thinking ⁦@SparkNZ⁩ ⁦@billbennettnz⁩ ,
  • And the coverage seems to miss that for some using on their carrier connection it streamed bea… ,
  • The coverage on is so ridiculous. How many people actually got great service vs. those that didn’t? And to… ,
  • A great read for all of you using Google... ,
  • Connect

Winsor on Leica…

John’s got an interesting post on Leica over at Brandshift. The FT carried a story in the April 16 edition on their continuing woes (annoying subscription required):

"The crisis at Leica, whose cameras were used by star photographers
such as Henri Cartier-Bresson and David Bailey, has deepened in recent
months as sales have slumped and banks have started to terminate credit
lines."

Even 100 year old brands need to evolve.
Look at what The Times did in London by moving to a new format – they
reversed a serious circulation slide. As they say, it’s not what you’ve got,
it’s what you do with it. And in Leica’s case, that would appear to be
not much at all.

3 Responses

  1. By Jeremy Pepper on April 20th, 2005 at 12:23 am

    Did Leica do nothing at all, or just not execute well? They have pushed into digital, and while it may have been late coming to the party, it still did make an entry into the consumer digital camera market with their distinctive look.

    Leica is an account that I would love to work on – it’s a great traditional name, and the cameras are great looking.

    In my interview with Lord Chadlington, he noted that a good campaign can kill a bad product faster. Maybe the corollary is that a bad campaign can kill a good product faster as well.

  2. By Andy on April 20th, 2005 at 12:39 pm

    It’s a combination of both I think. They still are a revered product – but appealing to a shrinking audience. Guys like us. And I’m not sure that a big part of it is that they are getting whipped by the tail of digital technology – which is bringing increasing functionality and quality and lower prices. Commoditization doesn’t mean lower quality. The same thing happened in the workstation market (remember SGI?). The notebook market (remember Grid?).

    At the end of the day marketers need to put campaigns aside and look at the fundamental trends shaping a moving markets. Brand and design are insufficient weapons to defend against deep shifts in a market. If you invert this, you see the success of Apple and the incredible demand for the Toyota Prius. Change takes time but once the tipping point is reached your technology had better get moving because your brand and ad campaigns will be of little use in the coming onslaught.

  3. By Bruce DeBoer on April 20th, 2005 at 1:44 pm

    My perception is that Leica didn’t execute well. It’s not important that a brand like theirs be first, but it needs to scream value based on quality. It didn’t succeed.

    They didn’t differentiate themselves based on their brand image; they just threw something out their.

    A friend of mine owned a Leica digital but ended up selling it for a Canon. Perhaps Leica’s tradition of quality and durability isn’t as important as soon as you add electronics with a 1-2 year cycle.

Leave a Reply to Andy

Connections

  • Connect
How did you connect?   [?]