Andy on Twitter

  • Would be consistent with what they’ve done around the world. And their right to do so. What the Aussie Govt is prop… ,
  • It’s interesting to me how when a company () details how it will respond to legislation it is deemed by the… ,
  • Good read on the interference of Govt in how the Internet works... Internet's founder, US officials slap down News… ,
  • OMG. So sad... ,
  • Good look at the impacts of SAH on compliance and tech... Be Prepared to Stay at Home in 2021 – even if you don’t w… ,
  • Dense Discovery is still my favourite newsletter. Look forward to it each week. Well worth supporting IMHO.… ,
  • Great read... I Feel Better Now | Jake Bittle ,
  • Another great example of cluelessness. Google has a right to exercise inordinate power over its own products. Just… ,
  • via ... is hard for us here to laugh. States now run the country abs SOMO sitting on the sidelines. ,
  • Still a bit surprising to me how often people confuse a successful company with a monopoly. And how they will compl… ,
  • And what about the rest of the Internet... they'll ask to dip their hand into the Google coffers as well... this is… ,
  • And oh, isn't Google fully within its rights to say "nah, don't think so, "we'll just stop surfacing news we have t… ,
  • Connect

Open Kimono

The Microsoft thing debated internally for all to see as Scoble challenges the way the company backed off supporting some anti-discrimination legislation in Washington State. Here’s his boss’s boss response. Other employees are jumping mad.

First, this is certainly a change in corporate communications – at least for the companies willing to tolerate embrace blogging. It is incredibly transparent – I guess follows the maxim that companies with nothing to hide needn’t fear transparency. If you are a stakeholder and you really can’t get a fix on Microsoft’s position via the media, then here it is. Once we waited for C/Net to publish another ‘leaked’ Microsoft memo. Now we get them real-time via blogs.

It’s also a shift in employee communications. Here we have the management/employee ‘food-chain’ exchanging views for everyone to see. No closed-door conversations. No gossip about what was said and what wasn’t. No time-lag between information distribution and eyeballs (total aside but a major issue for many companies is the hours it takes for email to reach desktops). Everyone is informed. Everyone gets to participate.

Second, it skirts an entire media cycle. Once upon a time we would have read about this exchange in the NYTimes or in The Reg. Now it’s here for all interested parties to see – unfolding in real-time. A journalist once said to me that transparency isn’t good for journalism. Maybe this points to that being true. If nothing it kills the leaked memo scoop so skillfully used by PR pros to manipulate the media generate coverage.

Third, and if nothing else, this certainly positions Microsoft as a company
willing to engage in dialog. But it’s more than that – this is an indicator of a new kind of
company. A company engaged in conversations and transparency. You could
even ask the question – How participatory is your company?

Microsoft might not be perfect – by any stretch – but this does signal a different kind of company.

Speak Up — Add Your Thoughts


  • Connect
How did you connect?   [?]