Andy on Twitter

  • Well, I’m furious at him and the equally draconian policies of NSW Govt. Seems you can do whatever you like in Gov… ,
  • Impression is Govt as a whole knows how to implement draconian policies with no public engagement or addressing dow… ,
  • And why not fix the crappy Covid App and make it a requirement to have it and your mobile with you at all times so… ,
  • I’ve just done 14 days self isolation on returning from Vic. Isn’t hard to do. And would have been happy to pay for… ,
  • This is just another example of heavy handed Govt policies with little thought for business or personal impacts. Al… ,
  • NSW latest move to force residents returning from Vic into mandatory isolation is poorly thought out. Instead just… ,
  • NZ needs this, Australia needs this. Instead of heavy handed Government policies implemented in the main without a… ,
  • Well, my Mac is over at the Apple Hospital being repaired - keyboard failure... iPad is worthless as a business too… ,
  • It's time to Dub on Telstra - more on the Dubber news from yesterday. ,
  • Big move by in going native on the Telstra network for Liberate, TIPT and SIP. Game changer… ,
  • Ummm... Yep... mess is an understatement 'A complete mess': angry business demands clarity from Victoria -… ,
  • Great piece from Stephane on Tokenized Banking and how it creates a better banking experience. Great prod… ,
  • Yep, those are the questions to ask. ,
  • Might just be me but feels like has descended into product and app anarchy. An S1 controller and now I need… ,
  • Gald to see this. The amount of corrupt marketing undertaken by Bitcoin companies is staggering. Steve Wozniak sues… ,
  • Connect

To Innovate, Be Willing To Be Misunderstood

Great transcript with Jeff Bezos on innovationright on the money:

…First of all, I think we have gotten pretty lucky recently. You should anticipate a certain amount of failure. Our two big initiatives, AWS and Kindle — two big, clean-sheet initiatives — have worked out very well. Ninety-plus percent of the innovation at Amazon is incremental and critical and much less risky. We know how to open new product categories. We know how to open new geographies. That doesn’t mean that these things are guaranteed to work, but we have a lot of expertise and a lot of knowledge. We know how to open new fulfillment centers, whether to open one, where to locate it, how big to make it. All of these things based on our operating history are things that we can analyze quantitatively rather than to have to make intuitive judgments.

When you look at something like, go back in time when we started working on Kindle almost seven years ago….  There you just have to place a bet. If you place enough of those bets, and if you place them early enough, none of them are ever betting the company. By the time you are betting the company, it means you haven’t invented for too long.

If you invent frequently and are willing to fail, then you never get to that point where you really need to bet the whole company. AWS also started about six or seven years ago. We are planting more seeds right now, and it is too early to talk about them, but we are going to continue to plant seeds. And I can guarantee you that everything we do will not work. And, I am never concerned about that…. We are stubbon on vision. We are flexible on details…. We don’t give up on things easily. Our third party seller business is an example of that. It took us three tries to get the third party seller business to work. We didn’t give up.

But. if you get to a point where you look at it and you say look, we are continuing invest a lot of money in this, and it’s not working and we have a bunch of other good businesses, and this is a hypotehetical scenario, and we are going to give up on this. On the day you decide to give up on it, what happens? Your operating margins go up because you stopped investing in something that wasn’t working. Is that really such a bad day?

So, my mind never lets me get in a place where I think we can’t afford to take these bets, because the bad case never seems that bad to me. And, I think to have that point of view, requires a corporate culture that does a few things. I don’t think every company can do that, can take that point of view. A big piece of the story we tell ourselves about who we are, is that we are willing to invent. We are willing to think long-term. We start with the customer and work backwards. And, very importantly, we are willing to be misunderstood for long periods of time.

I believe if you don’t have that set of things in your corporate culture, then you can’t do large-scale invention. You can do incremental invention, which is critically important for any company. But it is very difficult — if you are not willing to be misunderstood. People will misunderstand you.

Any time you do something big, that’s disruptive — Kindle, AWS — there will be critics. And there will be at least two kinds of critics. There will be well-meaning critics who genuinely misunderstand what you are doing or genuinely have a different opinion. And there will be the self-interested critics that have a vested interest in not liking what you are doing and they will have reason to misunderstand. And you have to be willing to ignore both types of critics. You listen to them, because you want to see, always testing, is it possible they are right?

But if you hold back and you say, ‘No, we believe in this vision,’ then you just stay heads down, stay focused and you build out your vision.

Speak Up — Add Your Thoughts

Connections

  • Connect
How did you connect?   [?]