Andy on Twitter

  • And so what they should do is apply the learnings from the four days to five days and get even more. Compressing ti… ,
  • Agree with Mark. How ridiculous is this. Ink is cheap in the world of digital - but doesn’t mean you should use it. ,
  • As much as I want Facebook to take as much responsibility as any publisher does for its ads, why aren’t lawmakers p… ,
  • M&A trends in consumer - readiness will matter ⁦@teamansarada⁩ ⁦@ansarada⁩ ,
  • Why do we even care about an irrelevant and illogical ranking system that even Rugby’s big boss denounces as a joke. ,
  • Great that Adidas sorted this but kind of staggering they weren't onto this for decades ,
  • Did Google Duplex just pass the Turing Test? And what happens if the interaction is made even more human with a dig… ,
  • Really basic stuff but worth a read... CMOs and Teamwork: How Can High-Performing Teams Shape Success? ,
  • Opinion | Marc Benioff: We Need a New Capitalism - The New York Times ,
  • When updates an iPhone app - Reminders - that renders it useless with the companion desktop app until Catalina arrives = ,
  • So fed up with commentators reffing the game. They have so much more to offer. All we get is constant… ,
  • How Negative News Distorts Our Thinking ⁦@SparkNZ⁩ ⁦@billbennettnz⁩ ,
  • And the coverage seems to miss that for some using on their carrier connection it streamed bea… ,
  • The coverage on is so ridiculous. How many people actually got great service vs. those that didn’t? And to… ,
  • A great read for all of you using Google... ,
  • Connect

To Innovate, Be Willing To Be Misunderstood

Great transcript with Jeff Bezos on innovationright on the money:

…First of all, I think we have gotten pretty lucky recently. You should anticipate a certain amount of failure. Our two big initiatives, AWS and Kindle — two big, clean-sheet initiatives — have worked out very well. Ninety-plus percent of the innovation at Amazon is incremental and critical and much less risky. We know how to open new product categories. We know how to open new geographies. That doesn’t mean that these things are guaranteed to work, but we have a lot of expertise and a lot of knowledge. We know how to open new fulfillment centers, whether to open one, where to locate it, how big to make it. All of these things based on our operating history are things that we can analyze quantitatively rather than to have to make intuitive judgments.

When you look at something like, go back in time when we started working on Kindle almost seven years ago….  There you just have to place a bet. If you place enough of those bets, and if you place them early enough, none of them are ever betting the company. By the time you are betting the company, it means you haven’t invented for too long.

If you invent frequently and are willing to fail, then you never get to that point where you really need to bet the whole company. AWS also started about six or seven years ago. We are planting more seeds right now, and it is too early to talk about them, but we are going to continue to plant seeds. And I can guarantee you that everything we do will not work. And, I am never concerned about that…. We are stubbon on vision. We are flexible on details…. We don’t give up on things easily. Our third party seller business is an example of that. It took us three tries to get the third party seller business to work. We didn’t give up.

But. if you get to a point where you look at it and you say look, we are continuing invest a lot of money in this, and it’s not working and we have a bunch of other good businesses, and this is a hypotehetical scenario, and we are going to give up on this. On the day you decide to give up on it, what happens? Your operating margins go up because you stopped investing in something that wasn’t working. Is that really such a bad day?

So, my mind never lets me get in a place where I think we can’t afford to take these bets, because the bad case never seems that bad to me. And, I think to have that point of view, requires a corporate culture that does a few things. I don’t think every company can do that, can take that point of view. A big piece of the story we tell ourselves about who we are, is that we are willing to invent. We are willing to think long-term. We start with the customer and work backwards. And, very importantly, we are willing to be misunderstood for long periods of time.

I believe if you don’t have that set of things in your corporate culture, then you can’t do large-scale invention. You can do incremental invention, which is critically important for any company. But it is very difficult — if you are not willing to be misunderstood. People will misunderstand you.

Any time you do something big, that’s disruptive — Kindle, AWS — there will be critics. And there will be at least two kinds of critics. There will be well-meaning critics who genuinely misunderstand what you are doing or genuinely have a different opinion. And there will be the self-interested critics that have a vested interest in not liking what you are doing and they will have reason to misunderstand. And you have to be willing to ignore both types of critics. You listen to them, because you want to see, always testing, is it possible they are right?

But if you hold back and you say, ‘No, we believe in this vision,’ then you just stay heads down, stay focused and you build out your vision.

Speak Up — Add Your Thoughts

Connections

  • Connect
How did you connect?   [?]