Andy on Twitter

  • A great read for all of you using Google... ,
  • Great interview on AI And The Era Of The Digital Human ,
  • I pick up a new Samsung or Huawei phone and think "this is seriously good" Then I read Apple's announcements today… ,
  • Children of Men is my fave... The best 100 films of the 21st century, according to 177 film critics around the worl… ,
  • Why does my iPhone insist on auto capitalising place names? What on earth is it thinking. ,
  • Why matters more than ever... reduce the complexity, increase confidence, realise better outcomes… ,
  • This might impact the marketing budgets of big business but it really impacts the business of small business owners. ,
  • And the shakedown plays out in other ways, Google doesn’t let you target their trademarks - or even mention “Google… ,
  • Am bewildered how tech companies think "Dark Mode" is a compelling feature. Billions in R&D and what we came up wit… ,
  • Cadbury's brand purpose is just 'woke-washing' - continue to agree with Mark's comments... instead of talking about… ,
  • Couldn't agree more. And how about allowing fake review sites surface higher?Google's paid search ads are a 'shaked… ,
  • Well, thank goodness I have a 13" MacBook... MacBook ban: Qantas, Virgin Australia clamp down on Apple laptops ,
  • Let’s see if this team can redeem themselves. I suspect not. Not due to not having the best talent… ,
  • Great to see Jon and the team out with another game ,
  • A fair analysis of this awful ⁦@allblacksrugby⁩ team. How the coaches could get this so wrong is beyond me. Hansen’… ,
  • Connect

Don’t Build Your Brand on Land You Don’t Own

John has some eloquently put advise for any brand – don’t build on land you don’t own. The spark came from this piece:

One point of frustration is Facebook’s ongoing squeezing of traffic to organic brand content. A digital agency exec described a recent meeting with Facebook that turned contentious. In what was meant to be a routine meeting, the exec said the Facebook rep told him the brands the agency works with would now have to pay Facebook for the same amount of reach they once enjoyed automatically. That position and Facebook’s perceived attitude have led to some disillusionment on Madison Avenue, where many bought into the dream peddled by Facebook that brands could set up shop on the platform as “publishers” and amass big audiences on their own….

…The cruel irony in all of this is that brands themselves greatly helped Facebook by giving it free advertising in their TV commercials and sites, urging their customers to “like” the brand — and paying Facebook to pile up likes. Facebook has returned the favor by choking off  brands’ access to those communities. That’s one expensive and frustrating lesson that it’s better to own than rent.

As consumer still embrace “free” platforms – who doesn’t like the simple utility of sharing on your favourite social platform – big brands have no excuse. They have the chops, technology and budget to build their own content streams on land they own. John puts it well:

Yup. You leased your land, Mr. Brand Marketer, and the rent’s going up. If I were you, I’d get back to your own domain. Spend your money building something worthy, then spend to drive people there. Your agencies have entire creative and media departments that are good at just such practices. They might even spend a fair amount carefully purchasing distribution through Facebook’s streams. I’m guessing Facebook will be happy to take your money. But there’s no point in paying them twice.

Speak Up — Add Your Thoughts

Connections

  • Connect
How did you connect?   [?]