Andy on Twitter

  • And so what they should do is apply the learnings from the four days to five days and get even more. Compressing ti… ,
  • Agree with Mark. How ridiculous is this. Ink is cheap in the world of digital - but doesn’t mean you should use it. ,
  • As much as I want Facebook to take as much responsibility as any publisher does for its ads, why aren’t lawmakers p… ,
  • M&A trends in consumer - readiness will matter ⁦@teamansarada⁩ ⁦@ansarada⁩ ,
  • Why do we even care about an irrelevant and illogical ranking system that even Rugby’s big boss denounces as a joke. ,
  • Great that Adidas sorted this but kind of staggering they weren't onto this for decades ,
  • Did Google Duplex just pass the Turing Test? And what happens if the interaction is made even more human with a dig… ,
  • Really basic stuff but worth a read... CMOs and Teamwork: How Can High-Performing Teams Shape Success? ,
  • Opinion | Marc Benioff: We Need a New Capitalism - The New York Times ,
  • When updates an iPhone app - Reminders - that renders it useless with the companion desktop app until Catalina arrives = ,
  • So fed up with commentators reffing the game. They have so much more to offer. All we get is constant… ,
  • How Negative News Distorts Our Thinking ⁦@SparkNZ⁩ ⁦@billbennettnz⁩ ,
  • And the coverage seems to miss that for some using on their carrier connection it streamed bea… ,
  • Connect

150 Relationships

So how many relationships can you maintain – and for how long can you maintain them without face-to-face contact. 150 and six are the numbers. The Dunbar Numbers:

For Dunbar, there’s a simple explanation for this: In the same way that human beings can’t breathe underwater or run the 100-meter dash in 2.5 seconds or see microwaves with the naked eye, most cannot maintain many more than 150 meaningful relationships. Cognitively, we’re just not built for it. As with any human trait, there are outliers in either direction—shut-ins on the one hand, Bill Clinton on the other. But in general, once a group grows larger than 150, its members begin to lose their sense of connection. We live on an increasingly urban, crowded planet, but we have Stone Age social capabilities. “The figure of 150 seems to represent the maximum number of individuals with whom we can have a genuinely social relationship, the kind of relationship that goes with knowing who they are and how they relate to us,” Dunbar has written. “Putting it another way, it’s the number of people you would not feel embarrassed about joining uninvited for a drink if you happened to bump into them in a bar.”

Speak Up — Add Your Thoughts

Connections

  • Connect
How did you connect?   [?]