Andy on Twitter

  • Quarter final super rugby and the stadium looks pretty empty. Sad state of super rugby in AU,
  • Agree with Mark - don't get it. Don't need to be reminded that my sandwich was a beauty chook. ,
  • I just published “The Cannes Conundrum” ,
  • Church in London has a little cafe in the entrance serving Allpress coffee. How good is that. God and coffee to go. ,
  • That flight to London is one epic trip. Thanks for an enjoyable flight.,
  • Must read for all marketers... ,
  • ... instead correlate TV to commercial outcomes, not online viewing ,
  • ... but buying TV so people watch you on YouTube while trying to sell Tide... that's more than strange ... ,
  • Another reason TV is so important a part of the Mix - spillover into online engagement ... ,
  • Well that's a change. Might be better to focus on the tech stuff though. And the need for lots of it. ,
  • Some beautiful coffee kit here... ,
  • Further evidence that the IRB are nearly as out of touch with rugby performance as the ARU ,
  • Acquisition is important for growth... But if its is just replacing loss, it isn’t growth – it’s just churn .. ,
  • Connect

apple’s secret approach

One of my team send me this piece on Apple’s “secret” approach to launches and their effectiveness.  The naivety of Journalists with regard to how a business works is at times, beyond compare.

As a consumer company, surprises work for Apple.  Shock and awe offsets the need for Proctor and Gamble-like media buys,  Use that approach where your customers are businesses of any size and you are likely to get slapped around.  First, they actually plan technology deployments.  Second, they look to a broad range of influencers throughout the purchase cycle – if you don’t have them lined-up, you don’t sell.

There is a third and more important point that applies to all markets.  Apple’s approach works only if you aren’t interested in any kind of conversation with the market.  I’d rather see a conversation with the market take place at every stage of a product’s evolution.

I’d take issue with the use of research looking at ketchup as a foundation for any good strategy for launching a $1,000+ device. The reporter actually recognizes this and then suggests the research was referencing Apple all along.  What crap.  At the end of the day, we know the average consumer will look and learn a multitude of times before buying – and consult a variety of sources.  Don’t think I’ve ever done that for ketchup.  Have done it for computers and nearly every other major purchase I’ve made.

At the end of the day, Apple’s approach works because they are the only player in their hyper-proprietary market.  They, well, surprise their fan base much in the same way that a rock band surprises its fans.  The echo and resonance occurs within that chamber.  For iPhone and iPod, it’s a good sized chamber – we know that drove Motorola nuts.  I’m guessing its the same for Nokia.  For the rest of it though, is it really working?

The rest of the technology sector is so hyper competitive and multi-market, other approaches are needed.  And, oh yeah, we’re increasingly looking beyond traditional media as a distribution vehicle for those announcements…

Speak Up — Add Your Thoughts


  • Connect
How did you connect?   [?]