Andy on Twitter

  • Publicis prioritizing investment is super smart. Nothing to be gained from investing in Cannes. Way over priced ,
  • Cannes this year is both shallow and disappointing. Some ok content but overly commercial and no CMO agenda ,
  • Shares in Cannes Lions' owner fall as Publicis pulls out and WPP voices doubts ,
  • All marketing arcs lead to membership. @Cannes_Lions,
  • Sharing = currency of communications. The system (social media) carries the currency and enables transactions . @Cannes_Lions,
  • Better never stops @Cannes_Lions,
  • Love the power of great brands + great artists + great institutions being drawn together by the artist ,
  • Yup ,
  • Unification of Unilever marketing org means better control over assets - less duplication/volume and more localization @Cannes_Lions,
  • Keith makes a fair point on reach - is about reaching those you haven't reached. @Cannes_Lions,
  • Creativity is last source of competitive advantage. Maybe... ,
  • Unstereotyped ads perform 25% better. a convenient number? but just the same a powerful point if even 5% better. @keithweed,
  • Brand safety and suitability go hand in hand. Some progress made but way to go. @keithweed,
  • Time to tackle the bots. Rip the ad fraud out. No such thing as cheap media. @Cannes_Lions,
  • Must count 100% of pixels as a view. Not 50% and not less. Need for 3rd party verification @Cannes_Lions,
  • Connect

apple’s secret approach

One of my team send me this piece on Apple’s “secret” approach to launches and their effectiveness.  The naivety of Journalists with regard to how a business works is at times, beyond compare.

As a consumer company, surprises work for Apple.  Shock and awe offsets the need for Proctor and Gamble-like media buys,  Use that approach where your customers are businesses of any size and you are likely to get slapped around.  First, they actually plan technology deployments.  Second, they look to a broad range of influencers throughout the purchase cycle – if you don’t have them lined-up, you don’t sell.

There is a third and more important point that applies to all markets.  Apple’s approach works only if you aren’t interested in any kind of conversation with the market.  I’d rather see a conversation with the market take place at every stage of a product’s evolution.

I’d take issue with the use of research looking at ketchup as a foundation for any good strategy for launching a $1,000+ device. The reporter actually recognizes this and then suggests the research was referencing Apple all along.  What crap.  At the end of the day, we know the average consumer will look and learn a multitude of times before buying – and consult a variety of sources.  Don’t think I’ve ever done that for ketchup.  Have done it for computers and nearly every other major purchase I’ve made.

At the end of the day, Apple’s approach works because they are the only player in their hyper-proprietary market.  They, well, surprise their fan base much in the same way that a rock band surprises its fans.  The echo and resonance occurs within that chamber.  For iPhone and iPod, it’s a good sized chamber – we know that drove Motorola nuts.  I’m guessing its the same for Nokia.  For the rest of it though, is it really working?

The rest of the technology sector is so hyper competitive and multi-market, other approaches are needed.  And, oh yeah, we’re increasingly looking beyond traditional media as a distribution vehicle for those announcements…

Speak Up — Add Your Thoughts


  • Connect
How did you connect?   [?]