Andy on Twitter

  • A great piece from Mark Ritson - must read for every marketer ,
  • Atlassian’s two-year cloud journey | TechCrunch ,
  • Clean Up Corrosive Interpersonal Dynamics on Your Team with This System – ,
  • Interesting experiencing a Microsoft vs Google office rig in several years. Suffering productivity decline. Google… ,
  • Great to see James Dilworth added to the business hall of fame. His legacy has made a difference to so many lives t… ,
  • What a great read ,
  • Sydney airport has gone from best in class to total nightmare since I’ve lived here. Time for the Govt to step in.,
  • When marketing a good idea online always good to include the URL ,
  • Connect

Wikilibel

CNet follows through on it’s earlier story regarding “editorial” issues at Wikipedia – this time looking at the libel angle. At the end of the day though, Wikipedia appears safe from claims:
Thanks to section 230 of the Federal Communications Decency Act (CDA), which became law in 1996, Wikipedia is most likely safe from legal liability for libel, regardless of how long an inaccurate article stays on the site. That’s because it is a service provider as opposed to a publisher such as Salon.com or CNN.com.
This is also the same for a TypePad – but it isn’t the same for an individual blogger.

Speak Up — Add Your Thoughts

Connections

  • Connect
How did you connect?   [?]
Indulgences-Coffee