Internet Radio 101
Nice overview from Businessweek.
Yummy…
Great link off Micropersuasion to this handy guide on how to get the most out of del.cio.us. This is a great example of revolutionary social networking technologies. I’ve been using Blink for years – but this is free…
Under Attack
Our rights are under attack. We all seem so preoccupied with figuring out how to enjoy, play in, and monetize the blogosphere that the issue of free speech isn’t getting the play it deserves. Gillmor says it all:
Apple Computer’s disgusting attack on three online journalism sites, in a witch hunt to find out who (if anyone) inside the company leaked information about allegedly upcoming products, has taken a nasty turn. Too bad it’s not surprising — and journalists of all kinds should be paying attention.
A judge in California has decided that the sites don’t qualify as "journalism" (AP) under state law and/or the First Amendment. By his bizarre and dangerous standard, I apparently stopped being a journalist the day I left my newspaper job after a quarter-century of writing for newspapers. (Note: At the request of lawyers for the sites, I’ve filed declarations — here (104k PDF) and here (1MB PDF) — saying that in my opinion these sites are performing a journalistic function. I haven’t been paid to do so.)
Not just journalists but PR people and citizens. The notion that we should not undertake activities such as reporting or analysis on the basis that only professionals can do that is ludicrous. Suddenly we are faced with a very ominous situation in which the Government, companies and big media don’t just get to control what we see and say – but also who gets to say it and when.
BusinessWeek also chimes in saying:
If the ruling holds, it will set a precedent certain to reverberate through the blogosphere because this means under the law bloggers aren’t considered journalists.
Problem is, we don’t want to be considered journalists – at least not me – all we want is the same right to responsible free speech (we still get sued for libel and fired for stupidity, just like everyone else). But for those sites publishing, or functioning, as media outlets – why shouldn’t they be subject to the same laws – or afforded the same rights – as Big Media?
Kevin Bankston of the EFF says:
"They’re people who gather news, and they do so with the intent to disseminate that news to the public. The only distinction to be made between these people and professional journalists at The New York Times is that they’re online only."
I’m not sure this works in terms of the entire blogosphere – and in all fairness he is speaking to the specific issue of blog media sites. We don’t fact-check like they do. We’re far more imperfect. We’re into the conversation less than the transmission. While Kevin’s argument is a good one I come at it from a slightly different direction.
And that is, implicit in the right to free speech is the right to report and when governments and corporations start medling in that, we all need to be very, very worried. Secondarily, they should also stay away from medling in what defines media and what doesn’t. It’s the fact that we’re not reporters or big media outlets, or, in print – that makes this such a revoultionary medium.
A House Of Cards
David’s got a great post on the tech research house of cards. I don’t know of any industry other than tech in which such "corrupting" business practices exist. The problem I have with it isn’t the people – there are lots of great, honest analysts out there. Just like there are plenty of great, honest PR folks. He points to a recent edition of the Internet Acceleration newsletter which is worth a read…
What isn’t OK is the business practice of pay-for-play masquerading as independent consultancy. The only equity in it is that this model punishes big and small alike. The big have to keep fueling the beast and where they don’t they suddenly see their rankings plummet and adverse commentary. The small can’t afford to really play at all.
What will it take for the industry to really start talking about this issue? Maybe a little more chatter in the blogosphere? We just need more people to step up.
This is something the financial analyst community has had to deal with in spades. They’ve had to build walls and processes where none existed before. They’ve been held into account, sued and fined. Where’s Spitzer when you need him?
Here are some starter thoughts:
- As an industry we launch the Industry Research Transparency Portal:- companies would log what I suggest in 2). It would also be the major portal for filing complaints and reviewing research. All analysts would be able to submit research papers for peer and industry review. And vendors would be able to do the same. This is something that social networking technologies really enable. The IRTP mark would become a quality mark that could be applied to research over time. The IRTP board would consist of CIOs.
- All major companies launch a Industry Research Transparency Site:- this site would disclose who is spending what with who.
The simplest solution is that all companies suspend payments to any company engaging in research of it. In other words, all companies unanimously agree not to pay-to-play. This is also the most unlikely given that most large firms have a heavy dependency on company revenue (both consulting and reports). And, there are many analysts that add an enormous amount of value to technology and marketing efforts. What is likely though is that the current status-quo won’t continue – the winds of transparency are blowing into every corner of tech.
BusinessWeek on Slashdot…
Worth a read – on Slashdot’s delcining effectiveness as a "Pointer". Not that a sample of one really matters but I’m reading the site more than ever…
