Andy on Twitter

  • Self help posts on Medium have reached toxic levels. .,
  • Malcolm Turnbull thinks Australia Post's CEO is overpaid - and it looks like he's the world's most expensive postie ,
  • “Algolia: The Most Impactful Early Sales Tactics” ,
  • DropBox story is just amazing – From zero to a billion in a decade ,
  • Wandered into JBHifi. Had what I needed on display but not in stock. Why merch what you don't have. Bring on Amazon. .,
  • Wow, was waiting for Amazon to arrive and nuke Aussie retail. Seems they Rent needed. Herringbone and R&B now in VA. ,
  • I Work from Home - The New Yorker ,
  • Dan has some good thoughts here on defining social media success by on @LinkedIn,
  • It's like forgot about dashboard in OSX. Why not just remove it?,
  • Great thoughts on agile marketing. ,
  • They are back! I want one of those hats! Jamiroquai - Automaton via @YouTube,
  • What happened to our Democratic leaders ? The silence is deafening. Stand-up with us and fight this. ,
  • So many clever fintech startups emerging and getting funding ,
  • Reading the latest economist - strikes me how bad B2B advertising is. Why do Co's think animating bad ads makes them better?,
  • Great read.... ,
  • Connect

Lazy Bastards…

Great article from Slate on how to write online. Terrific tips that apply to everything. I love this notion:

Nielsen champions the idea of information foraging. Humans are informavores. On the Internet, we hunt for facts. In earlier days, when switching between sites was time-consuming, we tended to stay in one place and dig. Now we assess a site quickly, looking for an “information scent.” We move on if there doesn’t seem to be any food around.

The trick is to really understand how users read on the Web. And we really read different. Here’s some terrific stuff for you informavores on eye tracking research.

I’ve also been following Nick’s thinking (and here) on how the online world might be changing how we read. It’s definitely impacting my book reading, which I am just finding harder and harder. Seems lots of folks are forgetting how to read… Is it that Google is giving us pond-skater minds? Andrew Sullivan ponders:

Are we fast losing the capacity to think deeply, calmly and seriously? Have we all succumbed to Internet attention-deficit disorder? Or, to put it more directly: if you’re looking at a monitor right now, are you still reading this, or are you about to click on another link?

For me its an economic issue… Social media is absorbing the time spent in front of a book, TV, or DVD. And the more I use it the more I like the links and connections. The comments. And the community of folks. Its part voyeurism and part participation.

One Response

  1. By Tim Walker on June 26th, 2008 at 8:47 am

    Good thoughts, Andy. The big question this asks of us, I think is this: Can we develop new skills (meta-skills?) that allow us to decide clearly when we should read Web-style and when we should invest the time to read book-style.

    Ideally, we’d ADD the new skills of the Web & social-media realm — because these skills are obviously useful — while also retaining the old skills of book reading, deep reflection, etc. . . . because those skills are ALSO still useful.

Speak Up — Add Your Thoughts

Connections

  • Connect
How did you connect?   [?]
Indulgences-Coffee