Andy on Twitter

  • The great thing about Twitter is being a able to have chats with my President. All one way but chats just the same. He's in Sicily!,
  • Peter Farrell is so impressive. Such an amazing Aussie brand and product. Solving real issues. Sleep disorders are a disease.,
  • As much as I complain about airlines huge thanks to for great service on my epic SYD-LAX-AUS-SFO-SJC-LAX-SYD-ADL trip,
  • So proud of the RL team. Amazing achievement. ,
  • Just finishing preso on Mobile experience has by far the worst airline mobile app I've ever reviewed. Shocking. @epicfail,
  • Ultimate in bank branding. Mega Bank. All they need to do is add evil. ,
  • What I Learned From Increasing My Prices - ExtendsLogic ,
  • On marketing workflows... ,
  • So love the story of Ted Kooser... ,
  • ,
  • So much . Going to miss you bro'. ,
  • The ageist conceit that younger workers have more energy | ,
  • Apple Pay is useless. Works less than 50% of time in taxis. Google Pay is 100% great. No bank should be supporting AP. ,
  • Super proud of presenting at YouTube brand camp. So good.,
  • Connect

Paying Attention To Pragmatic Needs

John Hagel on paying attention points to discussion in the blogosphere, precipitated by comments by Esther Dyson in a debate with Vint Cerf in the WSJ Online. Attention scarcity is continuing to grow and will be of concern to all marketers. As Michael argues, the foundation of the attention economy is the exchange that results from giving and receiving attention.

John points to comments from Andrew Keen who amplified on Esther’s comments:

Dyson says that the Internet in 2016 will come to reflect our hunger for attention. It will be electronic proof of our existence. To misquote Descartes, “I can be googled, therefore I am.” The future of media, therefore, for Dyson, is partly a Darwinian struggle to rank higher than others, and partly an existential struggle to prove one’s own identity. This vision is not dissimilar to my own theory of digital narcissism.

And, Scott Karp suggests that this holds the key to a transformation of media economics, radically undermining traditional revenue sources for the creation of content, especially advertising.

For marketers to succeed, we now need to be clear on not just what motivates a buyer to buy – the compelling need – but also what is behind the desire to receive attention. I don’t want to just receive attention because I have primal human needs – what Nick gets at. There are times when I need attention because I have a compelling reason to buy.

How do marketers identify that point of pragmatic need? Monitoring blogs and conversations is one way. But it is a reaction. The simple answer is by building relationships online. By enabling conversations.

Let me illustrate this point. I have a very pragmatic need. Four new tires. The Continental tires on my Audi – even with diligence, have a habit of exploding on road trips. I want the three good ones left off my car. The Audi dealership doesn’t want to have a conversation about this. It’s Continental, or, Michelin. I don’t particularly trust them – a cornerstone of any conversation.

So where can I have a conversation online – how can I post to a site my desire to have a conversation on a topic and attract businesses willing to share a point of view? In the attention economy it strikes me that there will be room for attention brokers to meet pragmatic needs. Just as there are all kinds of tools willing to satisfy our emotional needs with stats.

One Response

Speak Up — Add Your Thoughts

Connections

  • Connect
How did you connect?   [?]
Indulgences-Coffee