Andy on Twitter

  • Self help posts on Medium have reached toxic levels. .,
  • Malcolm Turnbull thinks Australia Post's CEO is overpaid - and it looks like he's the world's most expensive postie ,
  • “Algolia: The Most Impactful Early Sales Tactics” ,
  • DropBox story is just amazing – From zero to a billion in a decade ,
  • Wandered into JBHifi. Had what I needed on display but not in stock. Why merch what you don't have. Bring on Amazon. .,
  • Wow, was waiting for Amazon to arrive and nuke Aussie retail. Seems they Rent needed. Herringbone and R&B now in VA. ,
  • I Work from Home - The New Yorker ,
  • Dan has some good thoughts here on defining social media success by on @LinkedIn,
  • It's like forgot about dashboard in OSX. Why not just remove it?,
  • Great thoughts on agile marketing. ,
  • They are back! I want one of those hats! Jamiroquai - Automaton via @YouTube,
  • What happened to our Democratic leaders ? The silence is deafening. Stand-up with us and fight this. ,
  • So many clever fintech startups emerging and getting funding ,
  • Reading the latest economist - strikes me how bad B2B advertising is. Why do Co's think animating bad ads makes them better?,
  • Great read.... ,
  • Connect

A Blogger Isn’t A Blogger When…

They are paid to post on a blog other than their own. They then become a freelance writer, journalist, hack, whatever you want to call them.

The move by CNet and others to pay bloggers based on page views is no different than previous payment terms – such as words or stories – made to journalists, so, why call bloggers anything other than that? All that has changed is that the payment is more aligned with the reader/viewers interest level.

Further, the move is likely to continue to blur the lines between the independent publication and there so called independent bloggers. Take Information Week whose vendor blogger blogs away in a very self interested fashion only then to be named by the same publication as "one to watch" in the coming year in a full page spread. Self serving? Self interested? Biased? Yep – all of the above. And not an ounce of disclosure or transparency by either party.

As Steve suggests, this should raise an eyebrow – more than an eyebrow. But is very different than bloggers pimping products in post. It is far more subtle than that.

I initially misread a post by Mitch Ratcliffe, taking it (below) to suggest that if we don’t pay bloggers in the same way as journalists their posts don’t have to be informative or accurate? That isn’t what he meant as his comments suggest.:

"at ZD Net bloggers are compensated based on the number of page views they receive and a fraction of the pages in TalkBack, so at the end of the month the size of a check expresses something, but not necessarily our success in being informative or accurate."

I do think though that publications are attaching the mantle of blogger to paid writers and thereby opting out of any sense of integrity that applies to the masthead. Mitch is making an equally important but different point that popularity doesn’t correlate to accuracy – anywhere.

This has been going on for sometime, and pointed to by Tom Formenski and others – so Steve’s revelation isn’t so much that as a rehash. Either way, it’s worth flagging as the standards we expect of publications are increasingly compromised and new means of bloggers generating revenue come to fruition.

Nick makes a good point that businesses and workers tailor what they do in response to economic incentives – a shift in the way publishers and journalists make money means a shift in what gets published. But the message also makes the medium. And once fiercely independent online media are being transformed.

5 Responses

  1. By Mitch Ratcliffe on January 16th, 2007 at 4:16 pm

    Andy, that is a profound misreading of my posting. I was making the point that popularity doesn’t correlate to accuracy–anywhere.

  2. By Chris Ronan on January 16th, 2007 at 9:51 pm

    Dude, this is a great post. Seriously. Sibebar question though. If I am not “pimping products,” can I still be a pimp?

    This question comes up all of the time lately. I am using your post as a great answer to some of the questions I have asked lately about how to get a corporate blog going. You are dead on…we gotta resist the temptation and create great, original content.

    Talk soon.


  3. By James Governor on January 17th, 2007 at 5:23 am

    well steve should certainly know astro-turfing when he sees it. works for Edelman, right? If you work for Walmart…

    disclaimer> i am going to be doing some zdnet blogging this year

  4. By Usher Lieberman on January 17th, 2007 at 12:29 pm

    A blogger isn’t a blogger when they don’t accept comments and engage in a dialogue…whether they’re paid to or not is irrelevant IMHO. What matters is how the medium is used. If they’re being dishonest or disingenuous it will come out (see: Edelman, WalMart, et al). If they are engaging in open dialogue, disclosing potential conflicts of interest, listening to others (even when they disagree) well then, they’re blogging.

  5. By Matthew Jones on January 18th, 2007 at 11:23 am

    Hi, I have had a read of your blog and I found it very interesting. I noticed my blogs have a similar topic. I am wondering if you are interest in link exchange with my blogs: (successful Online Money Making !) (AGLOCO)

    I am aware that your site has more inbound links to it, so perhaps if I link to it from both my blogs you could link to one of my blogs?

    Or I could write a review of this site and you link to both?
    If you are interested just leave a comment on one of my blogs.

    Feel free to suggest and link exchange ‘deals’.
    (I am unable to use trackback – as I am on a blogger blog)

    keep up the great blog,

Speak Up — Add Your Thoughts


  • Connect
How did you connect?   [?]